Downward Spiral

After much work, my (small) Nq. pachydermaproject has been completed. The data has been tabulated, many graphs and comparisons were made, and the poster was prepared. Thanks, in no small part to my Professor whom I've been working on this with, I know have a rather professional looking poster to present. The last few days of the project were, perhaps understandably, the most hectic. And nerve wracking. At one point we thought that the entire way we were looking at the data was completely wrong, that we had defined a parameter in a way that it wasn't being used in most of the literature. Fortunately, it wasn't, there was just some initial confusion over the terms.
I have to say, its been a humbling experience, which is what I had hoped for and anticipated. Even in the simple write up for the poster I had a good deal of trouble. Often I was making 'wild assed speculations', and it was difficult to determine exactly what the data was permitting one to say about it and the situation. I have noticed before though that the best scientific papers are the ones where, when you read their results and conlcusions, you almost feel like the person is an idiot for stating things that are so completely obvious from their data. Similarly I have noticed that some of the best writting in general is the sort that states things that are pretty basic and that perhaps wouldn't be noticable in day to day life. I have yet to present the poster, so I might be quite a bit more humbled after that!
I am expecting that the people it is being presented to will have lots of questions, and that I will be caught completely flat footed at times. I haven't had any experience with forams or this region before this project, and there is such a huge amount of literature on those subjects, that there is simply no way that I won't be stammering in many responses. I can only hope that I at least manage to not make a fool of myself.
At the same time, I can relax a little because there are going to be a lot of other posters presented, and a lot of other papers being presented, so I at least won't feel too much in the spotlight.
I had previously presented some very preliminary results in a research conference at my University, and the people I had to talk to at that were mostly faculty and a hefty dose of people who weren't geolgy students or paleontology professionals, so it should turn out to be quite a different experience. At the same time, I expect that there will be some similarities. I know that when I have been at other poster presentations, I try to very quickly figure out what the whole presentation is about, why its important, and how good the evidence and interpreations match one another. People at the University research conference were, similarly, not interested in long drawn out explanations of things that they aren't familiar with, and at least one person actually interupted my initial blatherings to say, in effect, 'what were your conclusions'. That was good, because for the rest of the University conference I had to really excise out all the uncritical stuff. If there was anything anyone wasn't clear on, and they were interseted, they would ask.
So I expect that that aspect will be similar when I do present as this professional research conference. I will be presenting for two days also, and for a much longer period of time than at the University research conference. That should make a difference also.