Fantastic Bridges

This was pointed out to me by someone else, it's an odd glitch in google maps.

  The map shows south Brooklyn. Manhattan Beach is on the east-end of a  bit of land on the southern base of Brooklyn, with Coney Island at the west-end. The long strip at the bottom of the screen capture is a barrier island, made up of  Breezy Point and the Rockaways.  This map shows a bridge extending from Breezy Point into Manhattan Beach. There's no such bridge.

Here we're zoomed in on the north end of the 'bridge', and it actually is shown running into the CUNY Kingsborough Community College campus.
In fact a big chunk of the campus here is mysteriously shown as under water.
There's nothing like any of this in the satellite view, shown below.

Outside of this being a weird map rendering issue---and the error is not normally there, I've checked this map before---my first thought was, maybe it's a projection involving potential sea-level rise. But that wouldn't explain the "bridge", which is also rather wide for a bridge. Plus, the campus has a high sea-wall running all around it, so if the south end of it was flooded, the whole campus should be flooded. Water could be coming in to the west, off campus, and run into campus, but I'd think if that was the case then there'd be more flooding overall. Anyway, it's probably not the case that 'someone' at Google accidentally put in data from some imaginary flood scenario into the standard Google Map.

I actually wish this bridge did exist, it'd be better taking the Southern Parkway and driving through the Rockaways, and then over this bridge, than taking the dread Belt Parkway.

More on webpages

I was having a bit of a problem getting a viable web page up and running before. Our campus's document sharing system (Xythos) seemed to be working, but the webpages I was making just weren't functioning well. I had been using Microsoft Publisher 2007.
I then tried using Adobe Illustrator, but that ended up not being too easy to use, I could get a layout setup and create slices, but I really have no idea how to work it as html, all I had were images.

Then I found out about KompoZer, which is a 'what you see is what you get (WYSIWYG) editor. I've been able to get a two-page website up and running. It's really uninteresting right now, and exceptionally plain. I suspect that the coding is excessive for such a simple site too. But, now at least I have something I can work with:
https://wfs.gc.cuny.edu/rschenck/www/index.html

Facebook & Mobile access

reading: Facebook for Educators (pdf)

I'm interested in using Facebook in my classes, I've tried using Twitter in the past, but very few of my students actually have it. But it turns out nearly every one of them uses Facebook. So its time to get with the times!
I had thought that what I would be doing was making a profile, 'friending' their profiles, and communicating through that. Fortunately, that's not necessary at all. Apparently I can create Groups and Pages on the class and subject, and they can like them which will put updates into their newsfeed. They can also edit and share information directly on the Groups and Pages, all without us having to 'friend' one another.

A particularly curious bit of information from the above brochure is this:

your students are already using Facebook on their mobile phones while at home or when riding the bus. Your teaching can reach them at these moments. That opens new doors for teaching and learning....for many urban and minority youth, a mobile device is their primary access point to the Internet.

"Urban Minority Youth" describes a huge section of the student community that we serve, and yet our campus has its WiFi access completely locked up. If you go to any of 20 NYC Parks soon, you can get free WiFi, but on our Campus, you need to bring a laptop to the IT department, and they will install a program that will negotiate wireless access. You can imagine that this doesn't always work, and more importantly, you can't access the network with anything other than a laptop. No phones, no smartphones, no iPods or iPads. As a faculty member I can't access the WiFi network on my phone. I have a laptop on loan from the IT group itself and it doesn't connect even though its supposed to. The only time I've been able to access the schools network is through a hardwired office in my computer, the Podiums bolted to the floor in the classrooms, or by taking my loaner wireless laptop and plugging it into an ethernet jack.

It'd be really great, just from a class-functional perspective, if we could do things like remind students which room Academic Scheduling has dropped us into today, or when we've moved to a computer lab or different science lab-room. If they could quickly get WiFi on their phone, we could do this. I could send a message from the classroom. They could message me as they're walking through the front gate. We could exchange electronic documents in the classroom and verify right there that it went through. These perhaps aren't critical things, but its just strikingly odd that we have our network caged up like this.
Our campus isn't very large, but its larger than a wireless router's broadcast range. So why can't we just have open-access to our network? You'd have to actually be on campus to use it, so only our students and faculty and staff would be able to do it, its not like people would be coming in off the street just to use our WiFi. If Starbucks can do it, why can't we? Heck, if all of the Parks in NYC can do it, why can't we? We already have the infrastructure, and I seriously doubt that our campus has some sort of internet traffic cap, so maybe its time we did this.

via Storify

E-Portfolios and Cats

re: http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2011/06/eportfolios-all-thats-wrong-with-ed-tech.html

The crux of the above post is that e-portfolios were all the rage, but the fell out of favour because they add unnecessary complications, are de-socialized, have a steep learning curve, and often quickly just became ways to submit student work.

They are still alive at our campus. I don't use them and don't know anyone that uses them, but I occasionally see campus-wide-list-emails about them. Development of e-portfolios is managed by our 'Center for Advanced Technologies Training', along with many other systems, like BlackBoard, Blogs, and Wikis. Most of our faculty doesn't have their Faculty Profile webpage set up though, so I suspect that these resources are under-utilized. I know the people at our CATT and they are great, extremely helpful, so I have to think that what the above post suggests is true about a lot of electronic systems.

One comment on the above blog is interesting:

So e-portfolios are problematic if you're talking about education and learning, but in the context of schooling - the real world in which most people live, they work just fine (or as well as anything does...).

This highlights the difference between Actual Learning and Scholasticism. On the one hand our students, and this seems to be true everywhere regardless of what people say, are expected to basically jump through a set of hoops. And they approach it as such, tasks to check off in order to move up.

I was at a graduation ceremony this weekend at a high level private high school. The Valedictorian actually said just that, that they learned nothing in their school other than to use things like cliff and spark notes, and that putting work off until the night before was actually better than doing it ahead of time, not merely acceptable or sufficient but preferable because they can focus on other things to learn that are important (and he did not mean academic matters).

So it sounds like e-portfolios are great, as long as you want the same-old-same-old, or as long as you want 'top performing students' who are doing nothing.

I'll have to actually try to verify that though, maybe I need to talk to the guys over at our CATT.